}
Showing posts with label North Shore City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Shore City. Show all posts

Monday, April 24, 2023

A disappointment reworked

Sometimes, recipes we’ve made many different times don’t turn out right. There can be a lot of reasons why it happens, and when it does, it’s disappointing, though no big deal. Recently I had that happen, but the disappointment was broader.

A couple weeks ago, I got into my head that I wanted to have a Reuben sandwich, and that necessarily meant I’d have to make it at home: There’s no place I know of where it’s made on demand. However, the first place I ever had one was actually here in New Zealand, at a long-gone American deli/cafe/food shop that used to be on Auckland’s North Shore. Nigel and I went there his mum many years ago (probably more than 20…), and we all had Reubens for lunch (after which I bought some imported American food items for the first time ever).

The shop closed not all that long later as the village-like shopping area was torn down for re-development. The owner of the shop sold American products online for awhile, but he embarrassed me because, mad at the former North Shore City Council over the redevelopment, he referred to it as “North Short shitty council”; the crass, boorish American behaviour made me cringe, because it was precisely the sort of stereotypical “American abroad” (my mother would’ve called it “ugly American”) behaviour I was trying live down (I should add that later a new, much larger—and better—importer of US/Canadian/Mexican food products opened, and I’ve written several blog posts about going there; the original place was gone long before I began this blog).

With no place to go get Reubens, Nigel and I decided to make them at home, and at first it worked really well—they tasted nearly as good as the ones we’d ordered. The “near” part is because we were using products we could buy in our local supermarket, not products from the USA, and it wasn’t always a good match.

The first issue is that in New Zealand (and other Commonwealth countries) the corned been we have is called silverside (also called corned silverside). Wikipedia explains well:
Silverside is a cut of beef from the hindquarter of cattle, just above the leg cut. Called "silverside" in the UK, Ireland, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, it gets the name because of the "silverwall" on the side of the cut, a long fibrous "skin" of connective tissue (epimysium) which has to be removed as it is too tough to eat. The primary muscle is the biceps femoris.
What Americans think of as corned beef is a completely different cut, usually brisket, which is cut from the chest or lower breast of cattle. The two versions are very similar, but since I grew up with American corned beef, I can tell there’s a difference.

Nevertheless, it’s close enough to use, and to be sure it was good enough, I bought some sliced silverside from the deli counter at the supermarket, rather than the manufactured and prepackaged sort sold for sandwiches. This wasn’t why the Reuben I made was a disappointment.

Similarly, the Swiss cheese wasn’t a disappointment: While very expensive, it was nice and tasted “right” to me. In the past, Nigel and I had to buy Gruyère cheese, which was less, um, altered than the typical American version. In the many years since, what I think of as “Swiss cheese” has become far easier to get.

The problem also wasn’t the sauerkraut: I bought the tinned version made by an Australian company, and it tasted pretty much like what my parents used when I was a kid. The thing is, though, that when Nigel and I used to make Reubens, the sauerkraut was always acceptable, even if some were nicer than others.

The first thing to be amiss was the bread: The day I was at the supermarket, the only rye bread they stocked was what the manufacturer called “Roggenbrot Dark Rye”, and because Rye is grown in New Zealand, and the bread was made here, the bread was at least possibly in the same country as rye, though I suspect none happened to be in the factory at the time: It just tasted like a slightly denser mass-manufactured wheat bread, though darker in colour. It had no rye taste whatsoever, as far as I could tell, but as a mixed grain bread, it wasn’t bad for mass market bread (I don’t usually buy that brand because, for my taste, they’re all too insubstantial).

The next problem could well have been the “Russian dressing”: The recipe I found may have been too inauthentic, or I maybe I just made it wrong (I’d never made it before). Whatever the case, it added very little to the sandwich (though I liked it).

A final possibility is that I assembled it all wrong: I’m pretty sure NIgel used to make them, or, if I did, I can’t remember the last time I did—meaning, I have no idea what I used to do. Whatever, I don’t think we’d made theme for maybe a decade or so.

This was a huge disappointment because I’d been craving that Reuben. The fact it was a disappointment, though, made me glad I’d only made one. But, what to do with the rest of the stuff I didn’t use?

The cheese and silverside were easy: Sandwiches. I wasn’t sure to do with the unused sauerkraut I put in the fridge.

When I was a kid, my mother sometimes made what she called “sauerkraut and pork”, the two being boiled together and served—I think?—with mashed potato. It’s so long ago that I can’t remember precisely, but I do remember I wasn’t a fan of the pork because there were small bones mixed in (I have no idea what cut it was), and I hate bones in food.

I decided to make something that was kind of an homage to what my mother used to make, but more appropriate to the times (fresh pork is expensive these days) and to what I had on hand. So, I took out three pork sausages I had in the freezer, boiled them and then browned them in a pan. I also boiled actual potatoes and mashed them, and heated the sauerkraut (the meal is in the photo below). It was actually very nice, even if the sausages were heavily flavoured with spices/herbs. In fact, it was better than my Reuben was.

And that’s how I took what had been a disappointment and turned it into something much nicer, without wasting anything. In the end, I was happy with the final result, if not the first one. It’s still no big deal, though: Just a better one.


Sunday, December 07, 2014

One accident stopped a city

Yesterday, there was an accident in Auckland between three motorcycles and a truck. Nothing particularly unusual about that, but this one happened on the south end of the Auckland Harbour Bridge and brought nearly the entire city to a stop. This shouldn’t have happened, but it was also a warning.

I’ve expressed this view elsewhere and was accused of not understanding what police need to do in such cases, I was told this was an “inconvenience”, that people should just adapt and accept the jam, that they should have taken “other routes”. In other words, it was nothing and I should just shut up.

I’m well aware of what police need to do when there’s a serious crash, as I guess this was. I also know that such investigations, if botched, could result in police not getting a conviction in the event there was some criminal negligence involved (there isn’t always, by the way, and even with thorough investigations police can’t always prove such criminality). And, I also know that the safety of those conducting the scene investigation is important. I was told that I didn’t understand any of those things.

Those people were not just condescending (and sometimes rude), they’re also wrong.

The Auckland Harbour Bridge is arguably THE most important bit of road in New Zealand. It carries State Highway 1, the highway that stretches the length of the country. The bridge carries people and freight in both directions every hour of every day. It’s a vital link.

But police closed three of the four northbound lanes (at that time of day and week) for well over three hours and the result was chaos. Northbound traffic was backed up 20kms (roughly 12½ miles) south of the bridge. Drivers were urged to take State Highway 16 to go north, but that moved at a crawl, too—the two motorways were more stop than go.

In the central city, streets leading to the motorway were blocked. So were streets leading to those streets. Things barely moved. A little after 3pm, they reopened the Curran Street on-ramp and the three lanes they’d closed and traffic finally started moving north again. It took hours for the roading network to get back to normal.

What all of this means was that all traffic heading north to the Shore and beyond was effectively stopped. So was all traffic anywhere near to those people trying to head north. Those people weren’t just casual travellers out for a Saturday drive, though some were. Also stuck in the gridlock were buses heading in all directions—and buses are the only public transport to parts of the North Shore.

Also stopped were emergency vehicles who couldn’t get through blocked streets. As far as I know, there were no dire consequences from that. But to dismiss all that as mere “inconvenience” strikes me as incredibly self-righteous arrogance.

The police should have opened the road faster. That's probably the most watched stretch of highway in the country, with live video cameras pointing in every direction. If transit authorities didn’t catch the crash on video, then it was a major failure by them—and we have a right to know about it.

But if the crash was fully recorded, then all the police needed to do was photograph the scene, take measurements and clean up any debris and open the road. If they don’t have modern, up-to-date technology to help them do their jobs faster, then they need to get that technology. If their personnel haven’t been trained to move quickly but methodically, then they need better training. If the video cameras on and around the bridge didn’t catch the crash at a high-enough definition, then they need to install better cameras.

That stretch of road is far too important to Auckland—and all of New Zealand—for it to remain closed even a minute longer than is absolutely necessary. I was told that police have no legal obligation to consider the wider impact of closing roads for hours, even when they bring the city that’s home to more than a quarter of New Zealanders to a halt. If that’s really true, it should change: Police ought to re-open major roads as fast as possible, but they should have a legal obligation to reopen the bridge as quickly as they can.

This incident also highlighted the importance of a second harbour crossing, one that includes separated public transport so that the North Shore isn’t cut off when something like this happens. Beyond that, Auckland needs to build the common-sense Congestion Free Network that Generation Zero has been promoting.

The importance of these changes was highlighted by that fact that Auckland was brought to a stop by a mere traffic accident. Imagine if there had been a truly major incident, say, a fiery explosion of trucks on the bridge. Then, it would be days, not hours, before traffic was restored. If it was more serious still, it could be weeks or months. Auckland simply can’t cope with that sort of disruption.

So, when incidents like relatively minor traffic accidents occur on the bridge, the police must reopen the road as quickly as possible. But to prevent the crippling of Auckland—and New Zealand—by a bigger disaster, we need to make the system itself more resilient.

The incident yesterday wasn’t an “inconvenience”: It was a warning.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Campaign Diary

If I’d thought about it, I could have done a “Campaign Diary” series of posts about this election or, more specifically, what I’ve been doing. Too late now: The polls close at 7pm Saturday, and I have to stop posting tomorrow night.

Anyway, this is today:

We began with sign waving this morning. We decided to go somewhere completely different, so we went to Verrans Corner (photo above). I used to live on a street around the corner from this site, and I don’t recall ever seeing campaigns sign wave here.

We got a HUGE amount of support! Lots of toots, waves and smiles, and even our opponents were polite (I only saw one person give us the finger, and no one yelled “F-you” like yesterday). In fact, one trucker yelled out “LABOUR!” as he drove past us and tooted the truck’s throaty horn. It made up for the uncouth guy from the day before.

From there, it was off to start taking down our campaign signs (photo below). By law, ALL campaign signs must be down by midnight Friday/Saturday, and we wanted to get a head start, especially because weather predictions for tomorrow are truly awful.
The team starting to take down a sign that's clearly seen better days.

Removing the signs was very physical labour, something I’m both unaccustomed to and presently unfit for, but we persevered. Best comment of the day: My team mate Michael said, “Think of all the money you’re saving on gym fees!”

This evening I dragged my sore and weary body out to dinner with family to a place in Birkenhead. We saw that someone had written in chalk on the footpath (photo below), “VOTE” with an arrow pointing to the voting place at the nearby Rawene Centre. It was a nice way to end the evening.
Someone scrawled this in chalk on a Birkenhead footpath.

Tomorrow will be very busy, but I don’t know what, if anything, I can post before I start my Blog Blackout tomorrow night. Hopefully, I’ll at least be able to post some photos.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Waving signs

Last week, I mentioned that I’d gone “sign waving” for the first time. It was one of those things I hadn’t done before, but have now done several times. It’s actually energising, even if it does have an odd name.

What people really do is hold a sign and wave, but “holding a sign and waving” is a bit too long to say, really. Mind you, when my arms get tired, sometimes I really do “wave” my sign, by which I mean, make it “dance” a bit.

Every day we’ve done it, we’ve had toots of support from passing cars and lots of waves and smiles. Sometimes shouts of support, too. We also sometimes get a thumbs down, but we just smile and wave all the more and they can’t help but laugh.

Sadly, some people also give us the middle finger every now and then, but that’s pretty rare, fortunately—most people who are opposed to us are well-behaved. Today, however, in addition to a vigorously waved middle finger, we also got “F**k YOU!” yelled from a passing car. A real class act, that one—I'm sure his mother and grandmother would be SO proud.

Like I said, though, most people behave decently, and the majority express support for us.

The photo up top was from the sign waving yesterday morning (this time, I took it on my own phone). Maybe a half hour later, it started raining, then it started pouring, so we stopped early. We didn’t want any of our people getting sick so close to the election!

I took the photo below on Monday, from where I was standing in the line. It’s sort of an—ahem!—behind the scenes photo.

I forgot to take a photo today, partly because we battled rain today, too.

Two more days of sign waving to go, then the election!

A "behind the scenes" photo from Monday's sign waving.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Evening walk

Tonight family members and I went for an evening walk on Milford Beach on Auckland's North Shore. I'd never been there before.

The Island in the background is Rangitoto, and the black rock on the beach in the foreground was lava from the eruption that created Rangitoto centuries ago. I think it's a nice spot.

Friday, December 13, 2013

Auckland views: From Birkenhead Wharf

Yesterday was a beautiful, sunny and hot summer day in Auckland, and I had to runs some errands. So, I decided to swing down to the harbour to take a couple photos. These are two of them.

The photo above is the Auckland CBD (and Auckland Harbour Bridge) as seen from Birkenehad Wharf. Well, technically, it’s next to the park which is next to the wharf, but still. I visit the spot several times a year, because the view of the city is pretty good.

The photo below is of Chelsea Sugar Works, a place I posted about several years ago. This was also taken near the wharf. A guy who I used to work with went wind surfing there and said there were often sharks because of the sugar in the water. Well, that’s what he told me, anyway.

I’m planning on sharing more photos more often to better show some of my Auckland and my New Zealand. I haven’t done enough of that so far, I don’t think, and yesterday was too nice a day not to share.

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

H is for Houses

How convenient: The letter H rolls around for ABC Wednesday just when I’m ready to talk about what I’ve been up to for the past couple months, the thing that’s kept me from having time for blogging or, especially, podcasting. We are house hunting.

Overall, houses in New Zealand aren’t all that different from my native Illinois, but they are different in some significant ways. Most noticeable for me, Kiwi houses traditionally had the toilet in its own little room (more like a closet), separate from the bathroom. Sometimes the room—called a toilet—also has a little sink, and when they do, it’s often a ridiculous little thing with separate hot and cold taps no adult could ever get their hands under. All that’s beginning to change as houses get smaller or devote more space to other rooms, so the toilet is now often found in the bathroom.

Indoor/outdoor flow is important to Kiwis, as is offstreet parking and garaging, especially in places like Auckland. While sections (what we called "lots" in Illinois) used to be a quarter acre (a little over a thousand square metres), they're now usually much smaller in urban areas.

Auckland houses built before the 1980s often had little or no insulation because it wasn’t required. Gradually, the minimum amount of insulation required has been increased, and the government has a programme to help owners of older houses insulate. Modern houses are well-insulated.

Related to that, central heating is rare in New Zealand, and air conditioning only took off in the past decade (we’ve put it in every house we’ve owned together, four so far, the latest a whole-house ducted system). Most Kiwis heat their houses with woodfires, oil-column radiators or LPG (aka propane) gas heaters (New Zealand is one of only two countries in the world that allows un-flued LPG heaters in a house; the other is Italy). An increasing number of Kiwis are now installing heat pumps in one or more rooms.

Finding and buying a house is also very different from Illinois. There, a person sees a house they want to look at and they contact any realtor who arranges a viewing. This works because of the “multiple listing service” that realtors belong to. We have nothing like that in New Zealand. If a person likes a house, they ring up the agent listed in the ad or on the sign or, at the very least, an office of the realty firm selling the property; they are the only ones who can show the property. If buyers want to see a house from another firm, they ring up that firm, and so on. Realtors also usually hold one or more “open homes” on a weekend, usually around a half hour for any interested person to view the property (the owners leave during that time).

A relatively new phenomenon in New Zealand is the “buyer’s agent”, basically a specialist negotiator to whom buyers give limited power to act on their behalf. The agent will, for a fee, do basic research on the property to arrive at a fair asking price, place the offer and conduct any follow-up negotiations, all under the buyers’ instructions. One of the advantages of this is that it makes it impossible for a real estate agent to pressure buyers because they deal only with the buyers’ agent. It’s also especially useful when buyers have no idea what a fair price would be.

So, a house is found, an offer is placed, and the parties have agreed on a price. Buyers’ offers are usually conditional, which means that certain things need to happen before the sale is finalised. The typical ones are that the buyer obtains finance, second, and related, that they have the property valued by a registered valuer (this is for the mortgage—is the property worth enough to justify the price/mortgage?). Next, most buyers will require a builder’s report, basically an inspection as to the structural integrity of the building. These three conditions are usually required to be completed within ten business days. Finally, the other most-common condition is sale of the buyer’s own home, and the time allowed for that is negotiable, maybe 30 days to three months.

The buyers’ solicitor (lawyer) also does a title search to make sure there are no legal encumbrances (like liens); if there are any problems, that could kill the deal. If buyers want out of a sale, they will often invoke the finance clause, saying they didn’t obtain suitable finance.

When all the conditions have been met—finance obtained, a valuation high enough for the mortgage, the building is sound and buyers’ own house has sold—the deal is considered unconditional. At this point, it’s pretty much impossible to get out of the deal, though obviously lawyers have a few tricks up their sleeves.

At this point the clock starts ticking toward what’s called the settlement date. In Illinois, we called this “closing”, and the buyers and sellers and their lawyers met in one of the banks’ meeting rooms to sign all the paperwork and, once done, the keys were handed over to the buyer.

In New Zealand, the buyers and sellers meet with their solicitor privately to sign all the documentation for the property and the mortgage. This is done in the time between the offer going unconditional and the settlement date. On settlement date, the buyers’ solicitor authorises money to be moved around and, once the sellers’ solicitor receives confirmation that the sale is complete, they authorise that the keys be handed over. Typically, the buyer picks up the keys from the sellers’ realtor (or sometimes solicitor), and that’s it. It’s possible for all this to happen without the buyers and sellers ever actually meeting in real life.

The selling side is mostly the other side of the equation above, but begins when the sellers sign a sales agreement. This is usually a sole agency agreement—only that real estate firm can sell it—but sometimes sellers will use “multiple agency”, meaning they authorise more than one firm to sell their property. My own feeling is that this is a bad idea as no one agent has an incentive to work to sell the property, so it won’t be the first one they mention when presenting similar properties to prospective buyers. These listing agreements typically last three months.

In February, the average time it took to clear the inventory of unsold houses in New Zealand was 36 weeks, down slightly on January and down 26% on the previous year. This refers to clearing the stock of unsold houses, not necessarily how long a typical property takes to sell, which in Auckland is less than a month.

Overall, sales are up 25% as demand remains strong and the number of listings slowly grows. Asking prices in February were up 2%, which may seem small, but it was a new high national average of $426,575 (roughly US$350,000). Higher asking prices means, of course, higher sales prices.

According to QV, the average national sale price over the past three months was $396,958 (roughly US$325,000), up 2.7% over the past 12 months. Average prices in Auckland are significantly higher than the national average, at $527,617 (roughly US$432,000), up 5%. In North Shore, where we live, the average sale price in the past three months was $579,246 (roughly US$475,000), up 4.1%.

And that’s a bit about houses and the house selling/buying process in New Zealand. The photo at the top of this post is one I took before our house was listed (to show a potential private sale). It shows part of the deck we had extended last year. I like it because it’s from up high, like professional real estate photographers do. This raises a related issue: I haven’t decided whether I’ll post links to the listing for our house or not. On the one hand, the more exposure, the more potential buyers who will see it. On the other hand, let’s face it: It IS a bit stalkerish to allow random readers of my blog to see our house.

Any questions about New Zealand houses or the real estate market, fire away in the comments. Oh, and would you post a link to your house’s real estate listing?

Click the badge above to visit other bloggers taking part in ABC Wednesday—there are a lot of interesting and very diverse blog posts!

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

A tornado nearby

A tornado touched down in Albany, less than 10km away from us. The video above was posted within minutes of the storm, and was the first I saw has been removed by the user. Weird.

The tornado, with winds estimated to be between 180 and 200 kph, caused extensive damage, several injuries and one death. At our house, we had nothing more than very heavy rain (with some sunshine, no less) and the power flicked for a moment (to be clear, we’re fine and had no damage).

Once again, I heard about this breaking news first on Twitter. Well, apart from the storm outside, of course.

Tornadoes are very unusual in New Zealand, and if they happen damage is usually pretty minor. We don’t get the big F4 tornadoes that my homeland does. Part of the reason, I’ve been told, is that New Zealand doesn’t have much land mass, and so, storms can’t intensify as they can when crossing a continent. However, rising ocean temperatures and increased moisture in the atmosphere due to climate change may make severe storms with tornadoes more likely. As this storm shows, even a small tornado can be dangerous, and even deadly.

This is a threat I can understand and relate to, having grown up in the Midwest of the US. If it had been me near that tornado, I wouldn’t have been filming it but looking for cover. You can take the boy out of the Midwest, but…

The video below is the second one I saw. There's also a somewhat more dramatic video elsewhere. Photos can be seen here.

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Endings and beginnings

Tonight midnight will be a little more momentous than usual. Not just the end of a day, or a month, it’s also the end of existence for eight local councils in the Auckland region. In their places, Auckland Council will come into being.

This is an historic change, unlike anything I’ve ever seen. Well, it’s bigger than most people have ever seen, including all New Zealanders. The new Auckland will be huge and will dominate the country in ways it never did before. That’ll be a challenge for some to accept, or simply to get used to.

As it happens, today I bought a book on the history of North Shore, one of the councils that goes out of business tonight. I’ve long been fascinated by the history of the place I’ve lived most of my years in New Zealand. Now, of course, I’ll be learning about the history of a part of Auckland. Even for me, that’s kinda weird to think about.

Whatever any of us thought about the creation of this "super city", all of that's now irrelevant. We have to pull together to make the new city work because no one would benefit from failure. It'll probably take awhile before the people in the new Auckland start to think of themselves as truly part of the same city, but I think that will come in time.

But for now, it's time to say farewell to Auckland City, Manukau City, North Shore City, Waitakere City, Franklin District, Papakura Disrict, Rodney District and the Auckland Regional Council. Welcome, Auckland Council.

Now, let's get on with making our Auckland great.

Monday, October 25, 2010

One week until the end

One week from today, Auckland City will be history. So, too, North Shore City, Waitakere City, Manukau City, Franklin District, Rodney District, Papakura District and Auckland Regional Council. One week from today, the new Auckland Council will be ruling over us all.

The elections delivered a slightly centre-left government, and this may prove significant, with their dedication to local control and local decision-making. They may very well un-do some of the initial structure.

Or, maybe not—it’s really hard to guess about something when we have no idea how the new structure will work, much less how it should work.

The photo top left is of the sign outside the Auckland City Council’s Civic Building, near the statue of Lord Auckland (and taken the same day as that photo). It was a temporary sign put in place while Aotea Square was being redeveloped. That sign would be irrelevant one week from today (and won’t be there).

The photo below is of me posting my vote in the elections on October 1. I voted, as I always do, and most of my preferred candidates won—especially some I very much wanted to win. But since I voted, I also have the right to complain if things don’t go as I’d like. Fortunately, I have a blog to help me with that… like I needed an excuse!

I voted in the elections for the New Auckland.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Discerning democracy

There’s a saying about politics in New Zealand: Local government is for the politicians who aren’t smart enough for Parliament. Personally, I think MPs came up with that because some of them are demonstrably dumber than some local politicians, and local politics often attracts failed/defeated national politicians. Not much difference, in other words.

Personally, I think another description of local politicians is more apt: Mad, sad and unemployed. There are, of course, many who are none of those things, but then there are, well, those who are all three. No, I won’t say who are which.

But I was reminded of this today when our voting papers arrived for the Auckland Council (aka “Supercity”) elections. I read through the booklet containing candidate information and there were quite a few who qualified for one or more of the trio.

How is an ordinary person to decide among the contenders? The last time I counted, when the deadline closed, we had “102 people to choose among for 24 positions” (a few may have dropped out, and some are running for more than one position). How to choose among them?

Party isn’t a big help. Many conservative candidates are running under the National Party’s local affiliate, Citizens & Ratepayers (C&R), while some left-leaning candidates are running as City Vision (CV, and including the Labour Party, the Alliance and the Green Party). But CV isn’t on the North Shore, C&R is barely here and in disarray everywhere.

Instead, the Shore—which is arguably more conservative than the other side of the bridge—has a conservative grouping known as “North Now” that includes folks from the Act Party, an outspoken opponent of MMP and a former high-profile public servant who ran a failed parliamentary campaign on a Christian party ticket, among others. Centre and (barely) centre-left candidates are mainly in Shore Voice. Many more candidates—on both sides of the bridge, and all over the political spectrum—are running as independents. This is true of both Auckland Council and Local Board candidates, while the credible mayoral candidates are all running as some sort of independent.

So, the next step is to seek out the websites of the candidates or parties to find out what their positions are. Quite frankly, most of those sites are pretty bland and not very informative—and the rest are truly bad. Still, those sites, and the official information booklets will be all that most voters ever see.

Personally, I still hope to go to a candidates meeting, but there hasn’t yet been one held at a time I could attend. We’ll see. In the meantime, and maybe exclusively, I’ll use the meagre resources I have to try and make the most informed decision I can.

Worst-case scenario, we’re only stuck with them for three years.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

And the race is on…

Nominations for candidates in the local elections closed yesterday, so today I downloaded all the official lists of candidates from the new Auckland Council site. This year, of course, the citizens and ratepayers for eight separate councils will be choosing one new Auckland Council, 32 Local Boards and one Mayor for us all.

In my case, my choices are:
  • Mayor: 23 candidates for 1 position.
  • Auckland Council: 12 candidates for 2 positions in our Ward
  • Local Board: 23 candidates for 8 positions
So, I'll vote for 11 people out of a grand total of 58 contenders. Some of them can be ruled out instantly because they’re nutters, extremists and/or vanity candidates, but there are some serious choices no matter where one is on the political spectrum. That, at least, is a good thing.

Another good thing is that I have quite awhile to make my mind up—looks like I may need it!

Addendum: There are two other ordinary elections this year, ones that have nothing to do with the new Auckland Council. First, our local licensing trust has 11 candidates vying for six vacancies and our district health board has a whopping 33 candidates chasing seven vacancies.

So, the grand total is: I have 102 people to choose among for 24 positions. I should note that many of the same people are running for several positions at once, so there’s overlap. But, still—it’s a helluva lot of choices to make!

And that’s precisely why I love democracy so much.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Tweet me well

Recently, I read on our friends’ business blog that our local butcher was using Facebook to interact with customers. Since I was already a customer, I decided to log onto Facebook and “like” their page (“like” having replaced “become a fan”; neither one seems quite right to me, but I digress).

There’s one slight problem with this arrangement: I very seldom log into Facebook (it bores me silly), so I don’t see what they post. I also don’t subscribe to their newsletter, so I never know about upcoming specials.

For me, it would be far more efficient if they used Twitter to tell me about specials. I follow a few businesses on Twitter, most of them because they asked to follow me. I added a fast food restaurant we like because I thought it was funny, but they never Tweet anything.

How much promotion on Twitter would be too much? I don’t know, but all the folks I follow on Twitter have one thing in common: I get something of value from the connection. It could be simple interaction with friends, or it could be interesting or thought-provoking comments from people I don’t know, or maybe links to interesting articles, websites or YouTube videos. It can also be news, not just from journalists, but especially from ordinary people writing about news events they’re experiencing (like a rally, for example).

A business like my local butcher should respect that many people are competing for my attention on Twitter. They would have to post often enough that I might actually see it, and then offer something rewarding, like an announcement of a special (especially a secret one that people have to give a code to get!). They could post a link to something they just posted on their site, too (like, for my butcher, a new recipe).

However, they shouldn’t post so much that they’re competing with friends or other interesting people. What I definitely don’t want is the sort of banality I sometimes see from other Twitter users (imagine: “I was late for morning tea. I had a lot of chicken blood to wash off.” Or maybe, “OMG! Someone just ordered 50kg of sausages!”). That offers me nothing of value; I’ll tolerate that sort of thing from friends or people who are otherwise interesting, but probably not from a business wanting to market to me over Twitter.

To me, the beauty of them using Twitter is that I can opt-in and choose to follow. If I don’t want to be bothered anymore, I can always un-follow, and much more easily than unsubscribing from an e-newsletter. Besides, Twitter is the ultimate amalgamator of information on the web, so it makes sense that local businesses should use it, too.

So, local businesses, if you want to market to me through Twitter, respect my time and attention and offer me something of value. In other words, Tweet me well.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Bloomin’ lovely

Last Spring, I wrote about and posted pictures of some yuccas on our section that were blooming. Yesterday, I noticed that a different species of yucca in our front garden was also in bloom (photo above). Actually, I didn’t notice that: Our neighbour pointed it out to me. These blooms are much bigger and prettier than the Spring ones.

So twice in less than six months, just before and just after summer, I see plants in our garden blooming for the first time. I decide to take that as omens of good things to come. I mean, why not?

Monday, February 22, 2010

An Auckland summer night

This past Saturday night, we went to our niece’s 21st birthday party. Such parties are a big deal in New Zealand: A rite of passage that’s kind of orphaned now, with the voting and drinking ages both 18. Nevertheless, families and friends gather to celebrate that particular birthday. It was held exactly a week after we celebrated one of my sister-in-law’s 50th birthday party.

Her mum, Nigel’s sister, planned it as a surprise and held it at a local rugby league club. This has the advantage of there being bar service and security, neither of which would be true if she’d rented a community hall or something similar, as many people do. The best part was, though, that we didn’t have to go back the next day to clean up (that was also included).

It was a great night with family and her friends. I thought it was especially interesting to hear how highly her friends think of her. They should, of course, but I suppose I’m biased: She and her mum have been big parts of my life in New Zealand. She’s a great niece, and a fantastic person.

I don’t post many personal photos on my blog, basically because I won’t unless I ask the people in advance if it’s okay with them. I didn’t even ask. It wasn’t my night.

So instead, I'm including a couple photos I took looking out of the clubroom window at about 8:00pm. I’d never been up there before, they had some pretty nice views. The photo above is of Rangitoto. The photo below is looking further south, toward Takapuna, Bayswater and Devonport. North Head is also visible. Auckland City is further to the right, hidden by the palm on the right side of the photo.

We have no more family parties for several months. This is a good thing—we need a rest.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Summery video



It’s been just over a year since I last posted a video, and this was totally not worth the wait. I was just testing the new camera and posted it because my friend Tom, the Ramble Redhead, posted a video of a snowstorm going on where he lives. A little summery antidote seemed in order.

More—real—videos will be coming. Should you want to for some reason, you can download the full-resolution podcast version of this video from my podcast site.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Hitting the sales

We’re not stupid enough to attempt the Boxing Day sales—not at the malls, anyway. Apparently retailers rang up about as much in sales as they did on Boxing Day last year—but there are two more days in this holiday weekend to go.

This afternoon, when the sales had been going on for many hours already, Nigel and I headed out. As it turns out, we didn’t find what we were looking for (more searching is required). So we thought we may as well go to Wairau Park to look at a wireless weather station (so we can tell the temperature inside the house and out). We also decided to pop in Harvey Norman.

All retailers had something on special at a ridiculous price to get people in the door. For Harvey Norman, it was a laptop for $288. They were sold out by the time we got there, though we weren’t looking for one: We just thought we’d see what else was on special. I found the Samsung U10 flashcam on special for almost half off. I also got a memory card for it at 25% off.

Normally I wouldn’t mention all that here, but in this case it’s relevant because the camera fits in my pocket better than the still camera did, meaning there may be more casual snaps I can post. More importantly, though, it means I’ll again make videos now that I have a better camera that’s easier to bring along. Watch for them here, too.

And we did get a weather station—at about 30% off the regular price. Once we had it all set up, we found out that the temperature in the house was actually nearly as high as outside (just over 26 degrees inside—about 78 F). That’s way too high, and suggests the air conditioning isn’t working properly, so we'll ring next week too get it serviced.

The photos with this post were taken on Croftfield Lane in the Wairau Park area of North Shore City. The top one is looking in a southerly direction; you can see the cars going around the roundabout, but most of the cars visible are parked on the grass because the carparks were full. The photo below was taken at the same spot, looking the other way. Lots of cars parked on the grass, lots of people crossing the street all over the place.

Still, crazy as it was, traffic did move, and it wasn’t as mad as at other places. But we still basically kept far away from the malls. That was a smart move.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Just add water

Earlier this week we took a run up to Albany, here in North Shore City, and passed along Schnapper Rock Road. At one point we were stopped in traffic and I rolled down the window and snapped this photo (click on it to embiggen).

Very recently, there was nothing here (and the Google Maps image shows nothing there at the time they shot their photo). It’s weird to see formerly open land gobbled up so quickly.

This is kind of indicative of the way housing is being built now—almost American-style subdivisions (though they’re not called that here). This sort of thing has gone up all over the North Shore, and I’ve seen it in Hamilton, too: Reasonably large houses on relatively small sections (“lots” in the lingo where I grew up), generally only the minimum size allowed. Way different from the old days of “quarter acre sections”.

In the middle distance is a green field; that’s Albany Junior High School, the establishment of which caused a huge controversy because it was thought to be too American (at the time, and probably now, there were no “junior high schools” in New Zealand). Kind of fitting, then, that American-style housing is going up near it.

But the point of this photo isn’t to show another example of “creeping Americanism”; instead, I just wanted to show what a current housing development in our area looks like, and this is one of the clearest shots I’ve seen (thanks to the high ground).

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Christmastime in the city

The familiar signs of Christmas are all around—and summer weather is here more often than not. The photo of a Pohutukawa tree above was taken a couple weeks ago on The Strand in Takapuna, not far from the beach. It was a young tree, but especially full—perfect for a few photos.

The photo below was taken by looking to my left (the tree I was photographing is visible on the right-hand side of the photo). I didn’t go down to the beach because Jake was with me and we’re still keeping him far away from North Shore beaches, as we have since August.

This summer I hope to take even more photos of Auckland.