tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34249799.post6569576194066646771..comments2024-03-29T16:58:01.576+13:00Comments on AmeriNZ Blog: Arthur Answers, Part 4: Candidate questionsArthur Schenckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10568299067544221996noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34249799.post-64922051135108224802015-07-26T14:42:29.656+12:002015-07-26T14:42:29.656+12:00Good question! So good, it gets its own post.Good question! So good, it gets its own post.Arthur Schenck (AmeriNZ)http://amerinz.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34249799.post-77888583010862451272015-07-26T00:01:44.149+12:002015-07-26T00:01:44.149+12:00Much more than BENGHAZI!, I worry about the email ...Much more than BENGHAZI!, I worry about the email thing. She could - probably won't, but COULD - be indicated, I understand. <br /><br /><br />OH, I JUST THOUGHT OF ANOTHER QUESTION. If Hillary could NOT be the Democratic nominee, because of some legal problem, who would be? Who should be? Would it come out of the present collection? Or Clinton disciple Kirsten Gillibrand? Or would they exhume Al Gore from the crypt?rogerogreennoreply@blogger.com